Building an Effective Maintenance Schedule: PM vs PdM vs Reactive
The Three Maintenance Strategies
1. Reactive Maintenance
"Fix it when it breaks"
- Equipment fails unexpectedly
- Emergency repairs at premium cost
- High downtime
- Typical cost: $100–$500 per repair hour
When to use: Non-critical assets, items with low failure impact
2. Preventive Maintenance (PM)
"Replace it before it fails"
- Fixed schedule based on time or running hours
- Example: "Oil change every 500 hours" or "Filter replacement quarterly"
- Planned downtime
- Typical cost: $20–$80 per maintenance hour
When to use: Assets with predictable wear patterns (oil, filters, belts)
3. Predictive Maintenance (PdM)
"Monitor it and fix only when needed"
- Condition-based monitoring
- Example: "Replace pump bearing when vibration exceeds 0.5 inches/sec"
- Maintenance only when indicators suggest failure is near
- Typical cost: $50–$150 per hour + monitoring equipment
When to use: High-value, critical assets with expensive emergency repairs
Cost Comparison Over 5 Years
Assuming a critical pump, failure cost = $15,000:
| Strategy | PM Cost | PdM Cost | Emergency Repairs | Total | Downtime Hours | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | Reactive | $0 | $0 | $45,000 (3 failures) | $45,000 | 60 | | Preventive | $3,000 | $0 | $15,000 (1 failure) | $18,000 | 20 | | Predictive | $2,000 | $4,000 | $0 | $6,000 | 5 |
Designing Your Maintenance Mix
Critical Assets (Top 20% that drive 80% of value)
→ Use Predictive Maintenance
Standard Assets
→ Use Preventive Maintenance with basic PM tasks
Non-Critical Assets
→ Use Reactive Maintenance only
5-Step Implementation Plan
- Classify your equipment — Which tier (critical, standard, non-critical)?
- Define PM tasks — Oil changes, filter replacements, inspections
- Set schedules — Based on manufacturer recommendations and historical data
- Implement PdM on critical assets — Start with vibration analysis or oil analysis
- Track metrics — MTBF, MTTR, cost per failure, downtime
💰 A well-balanced maintenance program (70% PM + 20% PdM + 10% reactive) typically costs 30–40% less than reactive-only maintenance.